An Experimental View on Committees Providing Justified Representation

R. Bredereck, P. Faliszewski, A. Kaczmarczyk, R. Niedermeier
IJCAI 2019
Abstract
We provide an experimental study of committees that achieve (proportional/extended) justified representation (JR/PJR/EJR). In particular, we ask how many such committees exist and how varied they are in terms of voter satisfaction and coverage.  We find that under many natural distributions of preferences a large fraction of randomly selected JR committees also provide PJR and EJR.  Further, we find that the sets of JR committees for our elections are very varied and include both high-quality ones and not-so-appealing ones.

Experiments:

Election type Culture Candidates Voters Instances Parameters
Approval Impartial Culture {100, 200} {200, 100} 500 None
Approval Euclidean 1D {100} {100} 500 1D: Uniform Interval (r-UI) [0,1]; 2D: Uniform Square (r-US) [0,1]x[0,1]; For r-UI, r between 0.01 and 0.25 with step 0.01; For r-US, r between 0.02 and 0.5 with step 0.02
Approval Euclidean 2D {100, 200} {200, 100} 500 1D: Uniform Interval (r-UI) [0,1]; 2D: Uniform Square (r-US) [0,1]x[0,1]; For r-UI, r between 0.01 and 0.25 with step 0.01; For r-US, r between 0.02 and 0.5 with step 0.02
Approval Impartial Culture {100} {100} 500 None
Approval Euclidean 2D {100} {100} 500 1D: Uniform Interval (r-UI) [0,1]; 2D: Uniform Square (r-US) [0,1]x[0,1]; For r-UI, r between 0.01 and 0.25 with step 0.01; For r-US, r between 0.02 and 0.5 with step 0.02
Approval Euclidean 1D {100, 200} {200, 100} 500 1D: Uniform Interval (r-UI) [0,1]; 2D: Uniform Square (r-US) [0,1]x[0,1]; For r-UI, r between 0.01 and 0.25 with step 0.01; For r-US, r between 0.02 and 0.5 with step 0.02